"Flowers for Ackerman" by Karen B. Kaplan

Tell us what you thought about the November 2012 issue!

Moderator: Editors

Post Reply
User avatar
Robert_Moriyama
Editor Emeritus
Posts: 2379
Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

Re: "Flowers for Ackerman" by Karen B. Kaplan

Post by Robert_Moriyama »

Verse wrote:This a gentle and melancholy tale of loss and grief. The writing and flow were good, I didn't get hung up on anything.

Overall the tone was quite detached, almost clinical, which contrasted quite well against Gomer's own emotions and feelings as the story proceeded.

Yes, there was a lot of foreshadowing and the ending was predictable but I think that was the nature of this piece.
I suppose that Gomer's rejection of the rejuvenated Muriel.1 was a big hint that he could never be happy with a replacement, no matter how "lifelike". In the end, he wanted his Muriel, and even a machine that was, apparently, learning and adapting as it tried to fulfill its purpose, was still a poor substitute. (Besides, the .1 and .2 were considerably more complicated than a basic cellphone.)
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.

Jack London (1876-1916)
User avatar
Lester Curtis
Long Fiction Editor
Posts: 2736
Joined: January 11, 2010, 12:03:56 AM
Location: by the time you read this, I'll be somewhere else

Re: "Flowers for Ackerman" by Karen B. Kaplan

Post by Lester Curtis »

Odd. The writing style is light, to the point of being like a running joke, but the topic matter is dead serious (sorry about that).

Yes, it was obvious early on that Gomer wasn't going to be happy with a replacement. This was his way of trying to escape the grief. Along the way, though, he did express some of his grief, and finally decided that the pain was better than self-deception.

Nicely done; pleasant to read -- but a little shallow.
I was raised by humans. What's your excuse?
Post Reply

Return to “November 2012”