"Best of" selections - Agree? Disagree?

Tell us what you thought about the February 2009 issue!
Post Reply
User avatar
Robert_Moriyama
Editor Emeritus
Posts: 2379
Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Contact:

"Best of" selections - Agree? Disagree?

Post by Robert_Moriyama »

As noted, the "Best of" selections were chosen by the respective editors as our personal favorites from the February - December 2008 / January 2009 pool. Those who didn't read them the first time around might want to sample a few now...

And THEN you might comment on how exceptionally good (or bad) the editors' tastes may be. Think of it -- a chance to compliment or slag an author and an editor with a single comment! How can you resist?

RM
You can't wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.

Jack London (1876-1916)
User avatar
doc
WebMaven
Posts: 487
Joined: December 31, 1969, 08:00:00 PM
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Re: best of times/ worst of times

Post by doc »

rick tornello wrote:The readers get to comment all year. The Best Of is your party. Enjoy it.

And I am not kissing up. None of my stories made it. A poem did. But that's a different story.


RT
I have to admit that I feel I cheated a bit in my section, selecting three entries from a series of five articles, but since no one seemed to notice them when the ran the first time, I was hoping people might pick them up in the Best Of..., since they really are talking directly to our craft.
Post Reply

Return to “February 2009”